top of page
Search

Can Your Data Be Trusted Enough to Scale AI?

  • Writer: Tigran M.
    Tigran M.
  • Jun 24, 2025
  • 2 min read

Updated: Nov 6, 2025



AI initiatives often fail for the same reason: the data foundation isn’t ready. Teams move ahead with model development before addressing data quality, governance, or ownership, making it difficult to scale or even deliver reliably.


In a recent conversation with leaders at a fintech building ML-based fraud detection, the use cases were clear and the signals were mapped. But during integration, most of those signals turned out to come from legacy pipelines. The data wasn’t compliant, enriched, or aligned with platform standards. It was available, but not usable. With a board-driven deadline already set, they shipped anyway. The model went live, but cleanup took longer than expected and created friction across teams that hadn’t aligned early.


The risk wasn’t invisible, it was unowned. This is where program management makes the difference. The role isn’t to block progress but to surface decisions like this before they cascade into rework and misalignment.


This pattern is common. When data gaps appear, teams often ask if AI can help fix the data. It can’t. AI can classify, detect, and discover, but it cannot define ownership, guarantee quality, or align teams on what a signal means. Without that groundwork, AI only accelerates existing problems.


When trust in data breaks down, a familiar cycle follows:

  • Models are trained on what’s accessible, not what’s reliable

  • Teams build side pipelines to work around the platform

  • Data scientists stop trusting shared systems

  • Standards erode as deadlines take priority


As trust declines, adoption fades and alignment unravels quietly. Eventually, performance drops or audit issues surface, and no one can trace where the data came from or how it was handled. That’s not a tooling problem. It’s a trust problem.


The teams that get ahead of this treat readiness as part of delivery. They build shared accountability across data, engineering, product, and compliance, and they retire legacy pipelines instead of keeping them by default. In one program I supported, simply defining ownership and enforcing data rules early reduced errors by 20 percent.


Most organizations already know where trust breaks down. The question is whether they’re ready to face it.


 
 
 

Comments


tigranmuradyants

©2025 by Tigran Muradyants. All rights reserved.

bottom of page